Poster Presentation Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society and Society of Obstetric Medicine Australia and New Zealand Joint Scientific Meeting 2021

Comparing the perinatal outcomes using the New Zealand oral glucose tolerance test cut-off in 2 hospitals across the Tasman (#124)

Lili Yuen 1 , Vincent W Wong 2 , Louise Wolmarans 3 , David Simmons 1
  1. School of Medicine and the Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
  2. Diabetes & Endocrine Service, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
  3. Endocrinology Department, Waikato District Health Board, Hamilton, New Zealand

Introduction:

Australia and New Zealand (NZ) have maintained different oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) cutoffs to diagnose gestational diabetes (GDM).  We wanted to determine whether there were different pregnancy outcomes between Liverpool Hospital (LH) in Australia and Waikato Hospital (WH) in NZ depending whether they met the NZ GDM OGTT diagnostic criteria (NZGDM).

Method:

NZGDM has higher OGTT criteria with fasting ≥5.5mmol/L, 2-hour ≥9.0mmol/L.  LH followed Australian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society 1997 and 2014 GDM diagnostic criteria with lower cut-offs (fasting ≥5.5&≥5.1mmol/L;2-hour ≥8.0&≥8.5mmol/L).  Two groups from LH were defined as NZGDM OGTT positive or negative.  We devised a composite outcome of macrosomia, perinatal death, preterm delivery, neonatal hypoglycaemia and phototherapy.

Results:

There were 7,518 pregnancies.

GDM Grouping according to NZGDM

Waikato NZGDM positive

(n=2,278)

Liverpool NZGDM positive (n=2,403)

Liverpool NZGDM negative

(n-2,837)

 

MATERNAL OUTCOMES

 

 

 

 

HbA1c at diagnosis (%)

5.49(95%CI: 5.46–5.52)

5.35(95%CI: 5.37–5.41)

5.25(95%CI: 5.22–5.27)

<0.001

HbA1c during 3rd trimester(%)

5.51(95% CI: 5.49–5.54)

5.53(95%CI: 5.50–5.57)

5.47(95%CI: 5.43–5.51)

0.046

Metformin treatment

277(12.2%)

156(6.5%)

251(8.8%)

<0.001

Short-acting insulin treatment

797(35.0%)

870(36.2%)

639(22.5%)

<0.001

Long-acting insulin treatment

700(30.7%)

998(41.5%)

706(24.9%)

<0.001

Hypertension in pregnancy

85(3.7%)

143(6.0%)

123(4.3%)

<0.001

NEONATAL OUTCOMES

 

 

 

 

Delivery weeks

38.10(95%CI: 38.02–38.17)

38.59(95%CI: 38.52–38.67)

38.70(95%CI: 38.63–38.77)

<0.001

Preterm delivery(<37weeks)

214(9.4%)

211(8.8%)

229(8.1%)

0.295

Birth weight(g)

3371.8(95%CI: 3345.7–3397.1)

3318.6(95%CI: 3294.3–3343.0)

3319.5(95%CI: 3297.3–3341.7)

0.005

Macrosomia(>4500g)

62(2.7%)

42(1.7%)

28(1.0%)

<0.001

Normal vaginal delivery

1,306(57.3%)

971(40.4%)

1,218(42.9%)

<0.001

Caesarean delivery–emergency indication

415(18.2%)

269(11.2%)

301(10.6%)

<0.001

Caesarean delivery–elective indication

333(14.6%)

434(18.1%)

509(17.9%)

0.004

Neonatal intensive care admission

485(21.3%)

205(8.5%)

286(10.1%)

<0.001

Neonatal hypoglycaemia

660(29.0%)

658(27.4%)

538(19.0%)

<0.001

Major congenital abnormalities

35(1.5%)

21(0.9%)

21(0.7%)

0.034

Minor congenital abnormalities

38(1.7%)

81(3.4%)

83(2.9%)

0.002

Phototherapy for neonatal jaundice

115(5.0%)

19(0.8%)

13(0.5%)

<0.001

Perinatal death

5(0.2%)

24(1.0%)

20(0.7%)

0.008

Composite Outcome

          Odds Ratio

859(37.7%)

1.00

814(33.9%)

    0.865(95%CI: 0.752–0.995)

687(24.2%)

    0.559(95%CI: 0.486–0.643)

<0.001

Conclusions:

Women who were NZGDM negative had less pregnancy complications than NZGDM positive women. Women at LH had less pregnancy complications than women at WH in spite of comparable HbA1c in the third trimester.